Christianrockrocks - Làm mới mỗi ngày với các bản tin 24h siêu hot
  • Home
  • Du Lịch
  • Kinh Doanh
  • Làm Đẹp
Tuesday, November 16, 2021
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Du Lịch
  • Kinh Doanh
  • Làm Đẹp
No Result
View All Result
Christianrockrocks - Làm mới mỗi ngày với các bản tin 24h siêu hot
No Result
View All Result

Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy #39

admin by admin
July 24, 2020
in Âm Nhạc
34
Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy #39



Can two people who make the same bad decision bear different levels of moral responsibility? Today, we try to address this question with the concept of moral luck. Hank explains the difference between moral and causal responsibility, and the reasons we assign praise and blame.

Want more Crash Course in person? We’ll be at NerdCon: Nerdfighteria in Boston on February 25th and 26th! For more information, go to

Get your own Crash Course Philosophy mug or Chom Chom shirt from DFTBA:

The Latest from PBS Digital Studios:

—

Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios:

Crash Course Philosophy is sponsored by Squarespace.

—

Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook –
Twitter –
Tumblr –
Support CrashCourse on Patreon:

CC Kids:

Nguồn: https://christianrockrocks.com/

Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://christianrockrocks.com/am-nhac/

Xem thêm Bài Viết:

  • 7 Tướng nốt Ruồi "TIỀN TỶ " trên cơ thể Đàn Ông khiến Phụ Nữ Mê Đắm Lao vào như Con Thiêu Thân
  • Tải phần mềm học đàn piano trên máy tính
  • nốt ruồi trên mũi đàn ông ”TỐT HAY XẤU,PHÚC HAY HỌA”xem biết ngay
  • Hướng dẫn hack FULL VIP Mp3 Zing và Nhaccuatui mới nhất 2018
  • Dấu hiệu Người yêu cũ NYC vẫn còn YÊU bạn Jane Nguyen
Previous Post

Hướng Dẫn Gửi Phiếu Yêu Cầu Xóa Thông Tin Garena Không Chính Chủ Mới Nhất 2019

Next Post

How Villanova Defeated North Carolina In The NCAA Title Game

Next Post
How Villanova Defeated North Carolina In The NCAA Title Game

How Villanova Defeated North Carolina In The NCAA Title Game

Comments 34

  1. Ashen Fox says:
    1 year ago

    I always believed that both A and B are to blame because they both needlessly put others at risk.

    Reply
  2. Dee B says:
    1 year ago

    Noam Chomchomsky

    Reply
  3. Dogs And songs says:
    1 year ago

    A should Get punished for drunk driving and B for accsidently murdering the Kid and driving drunk

    Reply
  4. Ruchi Singh says:
    1 year ago

    Amazing ! Before this I had hardly given a thought to the differnce bw harm & wrongdoing

    Reply
  5. nerdie new says:
    1 year ago

    People should be judged by their actions and intentions not about the consequences. That is literally how "God" judges.

    Reply
  6. nerdie new says:
    1 year ago

    If moral is based on luck, then it wouldn't be fair if someone is morally better than others. Therefore, we should abandon morals and never judge someone. Because you can"t blame or praise someone for being unlucky or lucky therefore you can't blame or praise someone for being morally bad or good.

    Reply
  7. Dave S says:
    1 year ago

    It irks me when we praise firefighters and police for being these selfless individuals when that is not necessarily or even often their intent, but I guess I see that is necessary for society.

    Reply
  8. Daniel Morgan says:
    1 year ago

    Some schools of theology would disagree that ought implies can. God gives laws that He expressly knows and says no one is able to perfectly keep. Why such an unreachable standard of moral perfection? To humble us, cause us to see our insufficiency, and ask for His sufficiency.

    Reply
  9. ??? says:
    1 year ago

    Murmen rider

    Reply
  10. Martin P says:
    1 year ago

    Blame for what specifically? A and B are equally blameworthy for being irresponsible for driving drunk. B is guilty of both drunk driving and killing the child. If caught, an external factor, then A would have been arrested for drunk driving.

    Reply
  11. David Williams says:
    1 year ago

    Impossible to say if A would have or not

    Reply
  12. Old man says:
    1 year ago

    This video left me with a great sense of tragedy. Being human is hard, and it's just not fair.

    Reply
  13. SneekySMB says:
    1 year ago

    I think A and B should absolutely be blamed equally. After all, even if technically A's actions didn't directly cause a death, A is contributing to the norm of drunk driving which in turn causes many deaths, including, to some degree, the one directly caused by B.

    Reply
  14. Rickard Bergelius says:
    1 year ago

    Interesting. To me A and B are obviously both equally immoral. “Blame” is a tricky word. The parents can and probably will blame B for he accident but can hardly blame A.

    Reply
  15. Bobit boo says:
    1 year ago

    You keep saying that I probably think A has less blame. I don’t. A is just as bad as B

    Reply
  16. Fritz XXI-TFK-777 says:
    1 year ago

    Watched this right after the social psychology episodes on social thinking and influence. Great cross course linking!

    Reply
  17. Social Justice Warrior says:
    1 year ago

    the kid had a knife, everybody saw it

    Reply
  18. مصطفى موسى فليح says:
    1 year ago

    Luck is a delusion.

    Reply
  19. Timor Tlebzo says:
    1 year ago

    3:07 wait wait, so 90% of humans are not morally wrong since they can't truly think for themselves and are just a bunch of atoms bumping into each other convinced they have a free will when they never use it and instead just act on basic animal natural behavior.

    Reply
  20. klink 182 says:
    1 year ago

    This stuff needs more discussion. On a path to living well, we need to illuminate the obstacles in our path to proceed accordingly.. but a lot of it is outside of our control. But maybe give us the chance to learn the easy way, instead of creating externalities in the world before finally being caught up in another person's

    Reply
  21. Roger Climent says:
    1 year ago

    You say wrong does not need to be related to harm, but in fact in the example of the dressing room, the guys taking pictures are willing to do so, even knowing that there is a possibility that it may cause harm to someone in the future. So basically wrong always relates to harm somehow.

    Reply
  22. My Name says:
    1 year ago

    Creepy and wrong aren't the same thing, they're just similarly unpalatable so get jumbled up.

    Reply
  23. flobbie says:
    1 year ago

    They are not called A and B, their names are Alice and Bob.

    Reply
  24. john pepin says:
    1 year ago

    What if the child ran in front of B's car in a way that no matter how aware and sharp the driver the child would be run over?
    Does that change the moral responsibility?

    Reply
  25. Jasmine K says:
    1 year ago

    could it be possible that A was aware that the streets would be deserted? and that B was aware that their street is less likely to be deserted? (in that case, B is slightly more to blame)

    Reply
  26. Ameen says:
    1 year ago

    Yes. Both of them were equally responsible, but tell the parents of the kid that.

    Reply
  27. Ameen says:
    1 year ago

    Yes. Both of them were equally responsible, but tell the parents of the kid that.

    Reply
  28. Mnelisi Gasa says:
    1 year ago

    So what's the moral difference between murder and attempted murder? Should we not just slap the same punishment on both?

    Reply
  29. Jamen Rivera says:
    1 year ago

    How can you be a moral agent if you have no free will

    Reply
  30. Player_1 says:
    1 year ago

    0:23 Winds not winds

    Reply
  31. The Truth says:
    1 year ago

    Is it not in our control to prepare for things out of our control

    Reply
  32. Fred Mistele says:
    1 year ago

    Your philosophy is a joke, a bad one at that.

    Reply
  33. ᕱ⑅ᕱ says:
    1 year ago

    I finished this morality playlist in one sitting and my brain hurts…
    There’s so many theories, and they all seem somewhat but not completely true…idk…there’s no one right answer….
    I understand this moral luck concept. I always think of the driving forces behind people’s actions. These same 2 drunk people chose to drunk drive without considering the negative consequences. In other words, they are only thinking of their own needs/pleasure; if they thought that they could potentially kill a person and feel sympathy, they would not drink and drive. So I think they should be equally blamed, but punishment is different and that’s when luck comes to play

    Reply
  34. Mathew Wang says:
    1 year ago

    Did anyone else notice that the shirt the guy was wearing changed between 3:57 and 4:35? o_0

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Xem Thêm

[ Tập 7 ] – Ngọc Trinh và Vũ Khắc Tiệp khiến Bali "Hot" hơn bao giờ hết – Phần 2

[ Tập 7 ] – Ngọc Trinh và Vũ Khắc Tiệp khiến Bali "Hot" hơn bao giờ hết – Phần 2

July 21, 2020
[Full] Trải Nghiệm DU THUYỀN 5 SAO Tại VỊNH HẠ LONG | Tố đây! Travel Vlog

[Full] Trải Nghiệm DU THUYỀN 5 SAO Tại VỊNH HẠ LONG | Tố đây! Travel Vlog

July 25, 2020
[M9] #184: Đi xe giường nằm mà có hẳn phòng chờ VIP đồ ăn miễn phí | Hà Sơn Hải Vân | Yêu Máy Bay

[M9] #184: Đi xe giường nằm mà có hẳn phòng chờ VIP đồ ăn miễn phí | Hà Sơn Hải Vân | Yêu Máy Bay

July 25, 2020
[REVIEW KS WYNDHAM LEGEND HẠ LONG] Trải nghiệm cùng MC VTV Trịnh Vân Anh

[REVIEW KS WYNDHAM LEGEND HẠ LONG] Trải nghiệm cùng MC VTV Trịnh Vân Anh

July 23, 2020
[Review] Khách Sạn Hà Anh Mũi Né | Hotel Phan Thiết Bình Thuận – Dulich868.com

[Review] Khách Sạn Hà Anh Mũi Né | Hotel Phan Thiết Bình Thuận – Dulich868.com

July 16, 2020
[Review] Khách Sạn Hoàng Kim Mũi Né | Hotel Phan Thiết Bình Thuận – Dulich868.com

[Review] Khách Sạn Hoàng Kim Mũi Né | Hotel Phan Thiết Bình Thuận – Dulich868.com

July 23, 2020
  • Liên Hệ
  • Chính Sách Bảo Mật

© 2021 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Du Lịch
  • Kinh Doanh
  • Làm Đẹp

© 2021 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.